After reading the raws, I have to say that the leaker of brief summary is definitely the one who initiates the toxicity in the discussion every week.
• Luffy seems to give lots of damage to Kaido and we even have 3 pages of Luffy punching. The first part is so Luffy-centric but the leakers only said Luffy cannot use haki after the attack. He did not write a single word about the damages from Luffy.
• Zoro only attacks Kaido in this chapter, which is pretty awesome because Kaido acknowledge his strength. However, the leaker described it like Zoro attacking both Big Mom and Kaido.
• He clearly emphasized "Kaido was damaged" by Zoro in this week, but he never emphasized Luffy and the other supernovas also hurt Kaido (but simply say they attacked Kaido) in last chapter's brief summary.
• In last week, both Zoro and Killer were shocked by Big Mom's lightning but he only mentioned Killer got shocked in the brief summary.
• I still remember the leaker (not sure if it is the same person) said Sanji did not want to save Chiffon in the WCI spoiler...which was too ridiculous.
I don't mind readers only focus on their favorite characters, but as an information provider, the leaker should not put his personal preference and opinion in it when writing the summary.
Даже буржуи уже пишут что заебались от спойлериста чехлоеба